Work, family and home in our Digital futures
- More of the same or transformation, finally? While full of economic benefits, working from home most likely will
only worsen the anomie and social isolation many feel in modern society. But
there is a possibility that life could be much better for all of us, says
Sohail Inayatullah.
John Worthington works from home. He saves on gasoline and gets to
spend more time with his children and his wife. He drives to his inner city
office once or twice a week for meetings with colleagues.
A win-win story. Perhaps, perhaps not.
First, the Internet, while making it possible to telecommute, is still
much slower at home than at most offices. However, in a decade or so, with
information piped through cable – this is ATT's big gamble – it will become
lightening quick.
Second, although individuals like John Worthington no longer spend long
lunches with office friends, still they have their new virtual communities -
friends from various email groups they are part of. And in the next ten years,
they will not only be able to read their emails, they will be able to see and
hear them with v-net, visual net.
And yet all is not quite well.
There is no one to help clean the house tidy. At work, any mess was
cleaned up overnight. In the morning the office was immaculate. At home there is a constant battle between
the children's toys, the partner's work and one's own work. Endless filing
cabinets cannot solve the problem.
While there is a great deal of flexibility if one's children become
sick, work always stares at one's face.
Moreover, life has become more anonymous. Working from the suburbs
often means that the only community is the Net. Office friendships, chance lunches with colleagues, and even the
office will disappear. It will be a lonely life. Yes, the screen no longer
flickers, but virtual reality is still virtual. Digital gurus such as Gates and Negroponte have forgotten in
their rosy forecasts of digital nirvana that technological change without real
institutional change only makes life worse for most. As Marshall McLuhan warned two decades ago: "Excessive speed of change isolates
already fragmented individuals."
The technology then is not the
issue, community and relationship is.
Home is
no longer what it used to be
For Sharon Jones, the ups outweigh the cons. She too spends more time
with her kids. But she wishes that they had an extended family. The Net has
allowed the return to the home, but the home is no longer what it used to be.
The neighborhood community does not exist. Mum and Dad are not there to help,
they keep on getting sicker, and now are in an old folks home. She wishes she
could get them to live with her, but she can barely manage her kids, and her
husband – who insists on working from home, but does nothing to help around the
house, as that is still a woman's job – does not make things easier.
Just as neighborhood shops disappeared a few years back, Malls have now
started to go bankrupt. Internet shopping has reduced their traffic, and now there
is nowhere to take the kids (in any case, they prefer their virtual friends).
And the email grocer delivery person keeps on changing.
These two only slightly fictitious examples are our present and future.
Yes, we will work from home. Technological advances will let us do so.
Globalism will ensure we do so, as it will save government, university and
corporations on office space, and other infrastructure costs. Tenure and life-time jobs will disappear and
we will be mostly contract workers. In
the long term, few of us will actually work.
But the dream of telecommuting will not solve all our problems, largely
since home has changed so much..
For men, home was the safe secure space to retreat after a hard day's
work. The kids were already in bed, all that was left to do was eat, wash a few
dishes, watch television and try and have sex with one's wife. But with working
from home, responsibilities will begin to shift. Women will expect and demand
for men to help with the housework, with parenting. Not just their fair share
but equally responsibility. Men will not be able to escape to the office.
While men will only have to upgrade themselves, women will continue to
face a difficult and uncertain future.
Michelle Wallace, head of the School of Workplace and Development at
Southern Cross University says:
"Women who try and combine work with family are considered by
management as not serious about their jobs." "Studies show that women
work the 'double shift' and men with working wives often do not share half of
the domestic/family responsibilities."
Does this mean that the more things change, the more they stay the
same. Technology rearranges some of our work practices but it does not change
deeper held beliefs of productivity, hard work and blokism. Without fundamental
change, it only amplifies oppressive practices.
Worse, says Wallace, "The whole move to family friendly policies
[by governments in Europe, for example, especially Sweden] and increasing
interface between public and private can also be seen as increasing
surveillance of workers lives."
The power of management over the worker expands from the office to the
home. John, what are you wearing? While
there is a definite shift from blue-collar to white collar and in the next ten
years to no-collar workers, Management may soon desire to know what you are
wearing underneath that no-collar.
But are there any bright
futures in all this?
First, there is an age generation gap. Older managers will try and
control workers who begin to telecommute. Productivity will not be enough for
them, hours worked remains their measure.
The bonding or teamwork necessary through face-to-face meetings – the
endless boring office meetings everyone loves to hate – will also be an issue
for older managers.
But younger one's raised on the Net might see things differently.
Networking relationships, that is, less hierarchical, and more based on
productivity, excellence and quadruple bottom line might matter more.
Generation x'ers - writes Rosemary Herceg, author of Seven Myths and Realities of Generation X (www. Futurists.net.au) -
are far more sensitive to issues of gender, environment, social justice and
future generations, the impact of our current politics on the long term.
They are also more comfortable with multi-tasking. This is not just the
ability to go from one windows application to another , but to go from editing
and writing to changing diapers; to go from web designing, net commerce, to a
lovely afternoon spent with one's partner while the kids are at daycare (or
busy on their own screens, since they will have become screenagers).
This new generation might also begin to rethink the home. This means homes designed not for 19th
century office, with the old teak desk, the single book case, and the quill or
Parker pen, but high-tech smart homes and office, with plenty of space for
filing – electronic and paper. This also means homes that bring the ageing and
aged back in. With Australians and other OECD nations rapidly ageing – one out
of every four will be over 65 in a few decades and the average age will move
from the historical 20 to 40 or 50 – finding meaningful lives for the aged will
be crucial.
Ending the worldview that life ends at 40 or 50 or 60 will be the first
step. Ending the view that one works forty years and then mindlessly slips into
death or plays endless golf will be the next step. This means that the grand
divisions we have had for centuries of the male public sphere and female
private sphere will be challenged. The separation of inner city and suburbs
will be next. The separation of work and play will follow soon.
An information, postindustrial cyber era does not only mean that there
will be tons of more data or that we will remove ourselves further from the
farm; rather it could mean that the divisions of the industrial era are about
to collapse.
A high-tech, world, where work will intermingle with play, where kids
and the aged will play together, and communities will once again flourish –
once tele-decentralization goes into full swing – is quite possible. Once men
move back home, they will make sure that there is money for daycare, for
creating community at home.
And what of the fancy offices of inner cities? They will become like
the steel mills of the industrial era. Tourism relics. Just as the foreman has
disappeared from our vocabulary, the office manager, or the university
professor – or anyone who else who needs a captive physical audience to exist –
will slowly disappear. They will become
theme parks.
Alternatively, the digital era could reinforce managerial power,
surveillance and male domination. In response, we will return to a feudal
digital era, where the house becomes the man's Digital castle.
In either scenario, real changes are ahead.
Welcome to the Wired World.
Sohail Inayatullah is Professor, International Management Centres. He
works from home, and on occasion goes to an office at Queensland University of
Technology. His kids go to daycare but prefer playing from home. His wife has
no comments, and hope to write her own version of the Wired World.
|