Seven Hypothesis And Doorways To A Knowledge
EconomyDraft Speech,
July 11 Creating a Knowledge Economy for the Sunshine Coast
Sohail
Inayatullah
www.metafuture.org
The image of the future and
the learning community
The Sunshine
coast currently stands between different images of the future. The first
is the traditional, small scale, strong community, fishing village.
Basically, this was small scale tourism resort with some of the
economy corporatized (local plus national) This image and reality has
quickly disappeared in the last few decades. And with population growth
likely to continue, it is unlikely that the 1950s Australia can be
created. Globalization, cybertechnologies, the genetics revolution,
aging and other variables make this unlikely.
The other
image is that of endless urban growth, short termism, no concern for the
environment, generally becoming totally integrated into southeast
queensland, with no real self-identity. Tourism is heavily corporatized
here (international plus national with very little family scale
ventures). This would mean a conflictual divided society along the lines
of access to jobs, eduation, housing and wealth. One group would be the
tourists and international investors and the other single parents trying
to make a basic living. This appears likely unless government policy,
citizen demands and an alternative shared image of the future develops.
There are
other images as well. A transformational image, for example, becoming
small scale electronically connected communities based on sustainable
development and alternative lifestyles a different type of tourism,
a more localised economy.
Also,
transformational would be the coast finding some role in the globalized
economy, perhaps as a niche player in specific types of emerging tourism
its internationalization. Government working with small scale
enterprises, creating some spaces so they are not swallowed by bigger
players.
Part of the
challenge then is for the Coast to envision the futures desired and
develop broad agreement on it. While technologies, global economies and
demographic changes push the future, there is a pull of the future
the vision that defines what can be. There is also the weight of the
future traditional practices that limit our capacity to adapt, to
meet citizen,market, human needs.
Central to
adaption is creating a learning community. This notion is important in
that it provides a context for creating an alternative future. It is not
a recipe. Recipes for economic success come and go. In the 1980s it was
Japanese management. In the early 1990s it was export, export and
export. By the late 1990s
it switched to Silicon Valley and the notions of clusters of
innovativeness university plus research centers plus the government
providing incentives plus a tolerant creative workforce. Success creates
success as the image of what is possible changes the image becomes
realizable.
The issue of
how to respond to the knowledge economy is not only the problem of the
Coast. Taiwan has the same issue. It knows that while copying has served
well in the move from agriculture (self-reliance) to manufacturing (low
cost producer and exporter), it needs to shift to the new technologies.
But how to do so? And which new technologies. The response from the
Prime Minister has been the vision of Green Silicon Island ie
sustainability plus high technology plus independence. Singapore has met
the problem of innovation by legislating creativity - ie pushing art and
poetry, buying university leaders, buying biotech industry, but it is
still top down governance, soft fascism. The question is can Singapore
make the transition from manufacturing and finance to an innovator in
other areas, the emerging technologies.
The knowledge
economy is in some ways not recent, that is, all surplus, profit is
based on knowledge. It is more the percent engaged in
agricultural/manufacturing and services has dramatically changed in the
last century. Less and less people are needed to produce goods.
In the USA
today, 16% of the workforce is engaged in manufacturing, 3% in
agriculture and 87% in knowledge and services. Australia is quite
similar.
Moreover the
mode of producing is changing. What
is means is putting knoware in everything, smartness in everything. This
is crucial in that while productivity in agriculture and manufacturing
has increased 50 fold, changes in knowledge are quite small in
comparison.
Thus it also
means changing organizational structures so that creativity and
questioning can blossom this is essentially the notion of learning
communities. Learning
communities can 1. Increase productivity. 2. Weave communities. 3.
Create meaning and purpose, that is the framework of the triple bottom
line of prosperity, people and environment, that is, what is the triple
bottom line for it is for the vision of the community. Brisbane has
focused its entire framework around the vision of the liveable city and
now Brisbane 2010. This of course now needs to be updated. We need a
similar shared vision for the coast.
Thus, for the
Coast, with agricultural in continued decline, manufacturing not likely,
and tourism generally low paying, what are the alternatives? Can it
produce knowledge on a global scale? Is so, what knowledge can be
produced here better than elsewhere; who are the buyers, what is the
competitive advantage? How can tourism be smarter? While all reasonable
questions that must be answered, I see the "solution"
elsewhere, in capacity building, in creating learning communities.
The context
of this issue of the rise and fall of collectivities. In Toynbee's
model, it is the creative minority that meets the challenge. For the
Coast, the challenge is multifold: 1. Economic transformation, moving
away from the uni-dimensional tourism model and toward a knolwedge
economy, learning model. 2. Cultural transformation, moving away from
uni-culturalism to multiculturalsim and 3. Shared vision, finding shared
direction when there are deep cleavages between shires and between
interests groups. The
learning community model is creating contexts for learning so that the
creative minority is far less important, where knowledge is
democratized.
However, the
notion of a learning community, I hope does not become another recipe,
but rather a vision that creates more visions as well as a context that
builds the capacity to create better futures.
My analysis
of the learning community is the following. The
criteria is:
1
Flexibility
a.
Beyond industrial standardized model
b.
From production based to consumer based
c.
Mobility of mind and body
d.
Yoga as metaphor stretching body and mind
e.
Willingness to engage in cultural stretch (still keep basic root
structure), interpretive, not rigid
2
Responsiveness
a.
Needs of community
b.
Needs of market local and global
c.
Needs of citizens
d.
More important than actual structure of governance ie democracy,
aristocracy, dictatorship
e.
Speed, distinctive, courteous
Example, Debra Bristow, Mooloolaba primary school but structures of
school is still standardized, the infrastructure is not there.
3
Anticipatory
a.
Changing needs of citizen, community, market
b.
Novel planning methodologies scenarios (divergence), emerging
issues analysis (leading indicators of change, short and long term) and
causal layered analysis changes in litany, system, worldview and
myth
c.
Using multiple media web, tv, festivals for deepening
democracy.
d.
Iterative process of opinions plus expert knowledge leading to
community guidance
4
Innovativeness
a.
Questioning the product
b.
Questioning past, present and future
c.
Creative destructive
d.
Action learning learning from doing and reflecting
e.
Out of box learning hats white (logical positive); black
(logical negative); green (grow the idea); blue (authority); red
(passion); and orange (spiritual synthesis) plus hat for specific
function.
5
Leadership plus experts plus participatory
a.
Experts bring critical edge, knowledge
b.
People bring community concerns, new ideas, solutions
c.
Inclusion of others individuals then ways of knowing
d.
Leaders can give direction, vision, create context
Beattie
smart state.
6
Learning plus healing
a.
Learning to learn
b.
Life long learning
c.
Learning communities
d.
Smartness in all futures
e.
Triple bottom line people, planet and prosperity
f.
Healing self, other, environment and planet
Example, Biology professor complaining about lack of understanding of
species categories versus pokemon.
7
Microvita
a.
Reality spiritual and material
b.
Reality living symbiotic community as living organism.
c.
Change through technology, society plus unconscious, collective
vision
d.
Evolution can be ethical, with direction
People visit
Gaudi in Barcelona because they cant see it anywhere else? What do we
have that is distinctive? How can we embed learning and healing as well
as the other points in everything we do ?
What is our
vision for the Coast in 2012?