2003
Asia Pacific Cities Summit
International Keynote
Panel
Comments on City
Futures
by Sohail Inayatullah
We are to
explore the alternative futures of the city –
These
futures are based on the consequences of current trends as well as the
anticipation of emerging issues that will likely alter the current
trajectory of the city, in all its meanings.
The themes
that were developed were based on an environmental scan of the futures of
the city, a sorting out of hundreds of articles, books and speeches. They
were not mean to reproduce current knowledge but to move toward emergent
ideas.
What has
resulted are five broad themes.
-
The transformation of
urban sprawl
-
the greening of the city,
going far beyond recycling
-
the healthy city
-
the global and local city
-
and alternative futures
These are
not your typical concerns, normally, city politics is mired deep in local
politics, in issues of what is called here in Australia, roads, rates and
rubbish.
However,
cities were never, and especially now are not immune from the forces of
globalization, digitalization, multiculturalism, global warming, and other
factors that transform the nature of risk.
Cities as
well are becoming the site of social change
- UN conferences are referred to by their respective city hosts, Rio
92, for example. Nation-states are hard to maneuver, like grand oil tankers,
towns do not have the budget or populations to make a difference, but cities
do, they become the nexus between globalization and localization, creating
glo-calization. This means ensuring that local people are not lost in the
drive for the movement of capital but ensuring that they benefit from
internationalization.
City
futures is essentially about city design, city policymaking and city
planning. Why is this crucial. A recent study reports that that there is a
direct relationship between city design, in this case suburbanization, and
obesity. We know as well that there is a direct correlation between obesity
and cancer and heart attack rates. Thus, what seem as isolated phenomena are
in fact directly link. How we design cities in fact dramatically can alter
the quality of life of its citizens. Destroy communities for the sake of
modernity and what will result is increased crime, anomie, suicide an
depression. Build endless suburbs and the benefits of tradition – walking,
talking, connecting – will disappear. The healthy city is thus about
design.
And it is
about money. Have city policies that balk at green issues and the cost of
business will go up far more than the cost of
business of following green regulation. Urban and suburban
sprawl, traffic jams, car and bus pollution should not be seen as
externalities to be dealt with by individuals and the federal health system
but rather they are intrinsic to the city.
Water for example is seen as an externality but as water becomes a
crucial issue research is showing that the drought is linked to urban
planning patterns. For example, we now know that suburban sprawl - strip
malls, office buildings and other paved areas - have worsened the drought
covering half the United States by blocking billions of gallons of rainwater
from seeping through the soil to replenish ground water.
Thus,
Business costs go up, individuals and companies move to other cities, a
vicious cycle starts, and soon, what is left is a highly populated, and poor
city, caught in a cycle of corruption and waiting. At this stage, neither
moral individual actions or inspired leadership is enough, since the
structure has taken over.
But by
looking at future problems, anticipating them before they become too big to
solve, individuals and leaders can do a great deal.
Thus,
issues of recycling, clean energy public buses, transparency, walking and
bicycle lanes may seem unrelated but they are all directly related to
creating a better city.
Digitalization
is not separate from creating a better city, indeed, technology must be
embedded into all our future themes – digitalization can create a seamless
city, with information on tourist arrivals and departures all linked so that
costs are held to a minimum. Technology can be used so that more is created
with less, technology can help create a healthier city, mapping health
providers, making it easier to have access, monitoring our habits via
health-bots. Technology, however, is not the solution, we know we will have
more of it. The key is its appropriate use, and more ever, it is in
innovation in social and organizational know ware as well as in transforming
the worldviews that govern how we create the future city that is far more
important, and pivotal.
City design
and policy planning can thus influence individual behaviors but more
importantly is that it transforms systems. We know that better driver
training is not the solution of traffic fatalities but rethinking the
transportation system. Underneath this system is the worldview of the fast
and big city. City design is also then searching for new paradigms and
visions of the city. It is understanding the relationship between events,
structures, paradigms and images.
I know that
for many of you that word comes out at election time and then disappears
when the endless politics of budgets takes over. Thus, it is a long term
issue, and not meant to solve today’s issues but to ensure that 1. your
visions and not colonized by others 2. your visions are the most effective
and for the good of all.
It is these
visions and alternative scenarios that we will focus on in the mayoral
forums and the fish bowls. Research from the sunshine coast suggests that
the view of the city as business as usual, while certainly raising housing
prices and thus benefiting owners, is not the desired future by most,
indeed, only 5% favored this. Most favored three other images. These were 1.
electronically linked urban villages, that is, instead of big cities, many
linked villages. 2. the triple bottom line sustainable city – prosperity,
plus social justice plus environmental concerns. And 3 – the living gaian
city, that is, the city that literally becomes alive become of
digitalization and spiritualization.
What this
means is that spiritual and ethical behavior is not seen as divorced from
local city politics. Normally we segment – and rightly so – the church
and city hall (or the temple and city hall) but this emerging vision calls
for the integration, reconciliation, of the two. Thus politics is not just
seen as what happens at election time, and meditation is not just seen as a
personal practice but a new integration of the personal and the political,
creating a new imagination of the city.
Certainly
we are unlikely to see this type of ethical evolution (here moving far away
from Darwinian evolution) for 40-50 years, but in some form, I believe, it
is likely to come.
The issue
for you as leaders and policy makers is that 1. do you want to resist this
image, 2 or create a new vision.
This
meeting is your chance to do so, to explore the futures of the city. My hope
is that by the end of our three days, we will be able to create not only new
memes for the city future, but to say, that at Brisbane, many of the
world’s cities charted out a new course for themselves, fundamentally
changing city politics and economics.
I know
introduce you to two leaders in defining city futures. Johan Galtung and
former Lord Mayor Jim Soorley.