Alternative Futures of Dubronvik
Written by students of the American College of
Management, Dubrovnik and Sohail Inayatullah
Hotels, traffic systems, buses, airports all digitally
connected allowing the seamless and energy efficient movement of tourists
and goods, ensuring that tourism in Dubrovnik stays clean, green and
respectful of its historical splendour.
An independent city
– once again – with a valuable local currency, a thriving economy structured
around local cooperatives – an example to the rest of the world how money
can stay in the community, leading to prosperity for residents.
Drugs, sex, AIDS, Mcdonaldization and even Wal-Marts
– the destruction of traditional values that citizens of Dubrovnik hold
dear. Mass tourism leading to the breakdown of the infrastructure –
pollution, traffic jams and a loss of identity. Dubrovnik becomes just
another declining tourism destination.
Citizens develop foresight, a 2020 commission is set up
in the City council, and best practices and visioning chart Dubrovnik on a
new course. Green spaces are enlarged so that mass tourism development does
not destroy what is unique about the city. Ecological design of systems
ensures that building use energy efficiently. Dubrovnik focuses on two
markets – elite as well as student tourists, both necessary for the future
of the city.
These four scenarios were developed by students of the
American College of Management and Technology. They grew out of the New
Wave: Vision of Youth Conference organized by the young people of Dubrovnik
(in association with many nongovernmental organizations and governmental
organizations). They were the
outcome of a lecture given by former unesco professor (Trier, Germany, 1999)
and currently professor of futures studies in Taiwan and social sciences in
Australia, Sohail Inayatullah.
Inayatullah explained that there is not one future, but
alternative futures. To minimize risk and uncertainty it is wise to develop
scenarios of the future. Of course, gaining clarity on the desired vision of
the future is crucial. We are always, consciously or unconsciously, living
someone’s vision of the future. By developing our own, for our city,
nation, civilization, organization, we can decolonize the future and move in
the direction we wish.
As well, the vision of the future helps us move out of
the jungle. The jungle approach to planning and business is focused on
surviving, on being the fastest. From there we can move to the strategic,
planning ahead. But further are the mountain tops, the scenarios. These give
us the big picture. And high above is the star, the ideal. We may not reach
there, but the star gives us a direction for movement. This is especially
important as day-to-day we have many crisis. Each crisis overwhelms us. We
forget to think strategically, or to search for alternatives, and to stay
with our vision. Thus, by developing a landscape of the future, we have a
higher probability of realizing our goals.
As argued by researchers on the most successful
corporations – those with vision have done the best in terms of longevity
and indeed profit.
But along with the vision, is the push of the future.
These are trends that are changing the structure of the future. Aging, for
example, will have dramatic impacts throughout Europe. Who will pay for the
pension if the worker-retiree ratio moves from the current 3-1 to 1.5 to 1?
What will happen to city design as we age as a society? Will young people
become a highly valued resource? Or will there be generational wars?
But there are also weights to the future? Along with
the pull, the vision and the push, the trends, there is the weight. These
are forces and structures difficult to change; for example, patriarchy or
male ways of running cities and business, or old traumas from centuries of
conflict and war. The weights make it difficult to create our desired
future, but they also give us wisdom, knowing what is a fad, and what can
truly change society.
Finally, Inayatullah suggested that we need to
anticipate the future, to look for emerging issues, that is issues that have
still yet to ripen. These can help us avoid future problems as well as gain
new opportunities. What are the emerging issues in Dubrovnik, he asked? How
might, for example, digitalization change the nature of city governance.
This is more than having a nice webpage, but using the internet for more
efficient city services, and even for e-governance. How would an e-council
change local politics?
Based on his work with the Asia-Pacific Cities Summit
(a meeting of hundreds of mayors and deputy mayors), Inayatullah offered,
along with aging and digitalization, the following important themes for
cities.
These were:
1.
Transforming urban sprawl. American cities lose up to
76 billion US$ a year because of sprawl, that is, waiting in traffic, health
costs related to car pollution. A well, recent research shows that there is
a direct link between sprawl – suburbanization – and obesity. The
changing nature of the city has led to the rise of King Car, such that,
instead of walking, cars become the way of movement. This tyranny of
distance is one of the causes of obesity and thus cancer and heart attacks
in the Western world. 700,000 deaths in developing countries annually could be prevented if
three pollutants - carbon monoxide, suspended particulate matter, and lead
– were brought down to safe levels.
How can
Dubrovnik ensure that traffic jams do not spoil the tourist experience,
especially as Croatia moves up the world economy?
2.
The greening of the city. This means more than simply more green
spaces, but ensuring that all design is based on ecological principles and
has a productive after-life. Energy
efficiency in buses, in cars, is changing the nature of the city, and
creating a new industry. Australia, for example, has a new system to rate
all housing, giving stars for the following; (1) biodiversity, (2) embodied
energy, (3) energy consumption, (4) water consumption, (5) indoor air
quality, (6) resource efficiency, (7) location and transport, (8) waste
management and (9) food production
How can Dubrovnik become a greener city? What
architectural practices, city planning, needs to be rethought:? What from
the past should continue?
3. The
healthy city has inner and outer dimensions. The inner dimension is based on
perceptions of citizens on the quality of their life. Is it improving?.
Externally, it is based on longevity, being free of diseases,
reduced infant mortality.
500, 000 Europeans die annually from tobacco related illnesses – all which
can be easily prevented. However, the
foundations of
a healthy city include
many variables : environment, social justice, participation, basic needs,
connection, urban design, and access
to health
benefits.
Finally,
and most importantly, enhanced health is partly determined by level of social
connection in city. Social inclusion leads to better health.
Related is the notion of place. This has become more important for individuals and
community health as globalization makes place less important for business.
How
can Dubrovnik become an even healthier city? Can health become part of its
future focus, not just in terms of spas, but in terms of the real social,
economic, community and individual indicators?
4.
The global-local city. As globalization makes nations more porous and
capital freer, it as well opens up space for cities to create the futures
they desire. Changes at macro levels are not so easy, but cities, by being
attentive to their local citizens and needs, as well as to the larger global
environment (pollution, capital flows, tourists, diseases) can in fact
dramatically influence the future.
What
is Dubrovnik’s vision of the future? And who should it align with to
create that? Which other cities have similar pasts, presents and desired
futures?
The
session concluded with the development of interactive scenarios – digital
outlier, back to the past, worst case and best case.
What
next then for Dubrovnik?